Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

Ann Med Res. 2006; 13(4): 227-230


Is Kugel Herniorraphy Really Minimally Invasive?: A Prospective, Randomized Study+

 

Cüneyt Kırkıl*, Erhan Aygen*, Nurullah Bülbüller*, Osman Doğru*, Ahmet Ödekmerdan**, Mustafa Girgin*, Mehmet Saraç*

.




Abstract


 

Background: Kugel herniorraphy had been advocated as a minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to compare inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes after Kugel and Lichtenstein procedures.

Patients and methods: Thirty patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into Kugel and Lichtenstein repair groups. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected, to measure the levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, just prior to surgery and then 12 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative acute and chronic pains were evaluated. Time to return normal activities and work was recorded.

Results: Interleukin-6 levels significantly increased after Lichtenstein procedure. C-reactive protein levels were significantly increased in both groups. Patients had less postoperative pain and they recovered earlier after the Kugel procedure.

Conclusions:In conclusion our data show that Kugel herniorraphy causes less inflammatory response, less postoperative acute pain and rapid recovery compared with Lichtenstein technique.

Key Words: Kugel herniorraphy, Lichtenstein procedure, Inflammatory response, Minimally invasive






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.