ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2025; 50(4): 1004-1007


Labor induction vs. spontaneous onset: A comparative study of childbirth experience in Pakistani women

Hadia Riaz, Fatima Bibi, Michelle Maria, Faryall Zafar, Aemon, Seema Ashfaque Abro.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Objective: To examine how labor induction is linked to the child-birth experience and to assess differences in maternal and newborn outcomes in the two groups.
Methodology: The cross-sectional analytical study took place from January to July 2024 at a tertiary healthcare center in Pakistan and included 101 women delivering at term. Primiparous and multiparous women were included. All participants were divided into two different groups: induced labor (n=62) and spontaneous onset (n=39). We used the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) to collect data on age, gestational age, labor duration, use of analgesia, mode of delivery and CEQ scores. To look for associations, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used, with a p-value50), than those with induced labor (p=0.001). No statistical differences were found in the rates of both cesarean sections and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. There were fewer cases of labor augmentation and more satisfaction among mothers who had spontaneous labor. CEQ scores were significantly influenced by gestational age, analgesia use, and the duration of labor.
Conclusion: Women who went through spontaneous labor had much better child-birth experiences than those who underwent induction.

Key words: Labor induction, spontaneous labor, childbirth experience, CEQ score, maternal satisfaction, mode of delivery.





Bibliomed Article Statistics

6
25
29
34
7
R
E
A
D
S

9

47

35

38

8
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
1011120102
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.