ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



A systematic review and meta-analysis of ceftriaxone versus standard therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Aimen Naz, Taha Basit Ameen, Furqanullah Khalid, Abdul Raheem, Mohammad Bilal Abbasi, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Syed Illyas Ahmed, Maleeha Mehmood, Syeda Zainab Fatima Rizvi, Naeemullah Arbani, Muhammad Saleem Khuhro.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Background:
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. Although standard-of-care (SOC) treatments, such as oxacillin, nafcillin, and cefazolin, are effective, they require frequent dosing and prolonged hospital stays. Ceftriaxone, with its once-daily dosing, offers a potentially more convenient alternative. However, its efficacy and safety in treating MSSA-BSIs remain unclear.

Aim:
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone versus standard therapy across diverse clinical settings in adult patients with MSSA-BSIs.

Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to March 15, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing ceftriaxone with SOC for MSSA-BSI were included. The primary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hospital readmissions, treatment failure, emergency department visits, and length of hospital stay. Data analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software.

Results:
Nineteen studies were included with varied designs and clinical settings. Ceftriaxone showed no statistically significant difference in clinical cure [odds ratio (OR) 0.74, p = 0.391], microbiological cure (OR 0.94, p = 0.844), or 90-day mortality (OR 1.29, p = 0.498) compared with SOC. However, 30-day mortality was higher with ceftriaxone (OR 1.91, p = 0.004). Ceftriaxone demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward fewer ADRs and lower hospital readmission rates.

Conclusion:
Ceftriaxone may offer comparable efficacy and improved convenience in the treatment of MSSA-BSI for selected patients, particularly in outpatient settings. However, the increased risk of 30-day mortality highlights the need for caution in critically ill populations. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to clarify the role of ceftriaxone in MSSA-BSI management.

Key words: Ceftriaxone; MSSA; Bacteremia; Bloodstream infection; Antimicrobial therapy; Meta-analysis.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

34
R
E
A
D
S

41
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
02
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.