ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Research Article

Open Vet J. 2026; 16(3): 1793-1807


Prevalence and characterization of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from breast chicken meat

Mat Sa’ad Syamimi-Hanim, John Yew Huat Tang, Asmaliza Abd Ghani, Nor Khaizura Mahmud Ab Rashid.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Background:
Although chicken meat is a major source of dietary protein globally, it is highly prone to microbial spoilage, especially under refrigeration, posing economic and public health risks. Psychrotrophic Pseudomonas spp., particularly Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are key spoilage organisms due to their enzyme production, biofilm formation, and cold tolerance.

Aim:
This study determined the prevalence, virulence gene profiles, enzymatic activity, and antibiotic resistance profiles of P. fluorescens and P. aeruginosa isolated from raw chicken meat sold in supermarkets.

Methods:
Detection and isolation of Pseudomonas spp. in raw chicken samples were carried out using selective Pseudomonas agar. PCR assay used species-specific primers targeting adnA and toxA genes to confirm the presence of P. fluorescens and P. aeruginosa, respectively. The isolated P. fluorescens and P. aeruginosa were molecularly characterized using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the presence of genes responsible for biofilm formation, proteolytic enzymes, and virulence. The proteolytic and lipolytic activities of the isolates at 30 °C and 4°C using skim milk agar and tributyrin agar. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method.

Results:
Of 180 samples, 61 (33.9%) were positive for P. fluorescens and 34 (18.9%) were contaminated with P. aeruginosa, as confirmed by PCR assay. Molecular characterization of the P. fluorescens isolates revealed that 41.0% were positive for aprX and 8.2% had fliC, whereas the P. aeruginosa isolates showed the presence of oprL (58.8%), lasB (11.4%), and exoS (20.6%). Gene distribution varied across retail outlets, possibly reflecting differences in hygiene and storage conditions. At 4 °C, most P. fluorescens isolates (82%) displayed proteolytic activity, and all isolates showed lipolytic activity. P. aeruginosa showed low proteolytic (29.4%) but high lipolytic (88.2%) activity. These findings show their ability to degrade meat even under refrigeration conditions. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed high resistance to penicillin G, ampicillin, and piperacillin among all isolates. P. fluorescens showed notable resistance to ceftazidime (100%) but remained largely susceptible to gentamicin (80.3%) and levofloxacin (82.0%). P. aeruginosa exhibited similar trends, with high susceptibility to gentamicin (85.3%) and levofloxacin (91.2%). Moderate susceptibility to amikacin was observed in both of the aforementioned species. All isolates had MAR index scores above 0.2, and 19 P. fluorescens and 5 P. aeruginosa isolates were identified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), resistant to at least five antibiotic classes.

Conclusion:
These findings highlight the contamination of retail chicken meat by virulent, spoilage-causing, and antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas spp., which requires improved control measures to minimize spoilage and safeguard public health.

Key words: Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Antibiotic resistance; Protease; Lipase.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

52
R
E
A
D
S

12
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
04
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.