ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



Comparison of manual sperm analysis with computer-assisted sperm analysis: A comparative cross-sectional study

Ayesha Shiraz Baig, Mohammad Shoebuddin, Muneebuddin Ahmed.




Abstract
Cited by 6 Articles

Background: Conventional manual semen analysis is done routinely in most reproductive laboratories. Computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA), on the other hand, is more objective and timesaving counterpart to the conventional method. Different CASA software systems are available, some are fully automated. Thus, it is essential to analyze its performance and compare it with the conventional semen analysis method.

Aims and Objectives: Our objective was to analyze the same semen sample by manual method using Makler chamber and using sophisticated CASA software. Our aim was to find the level agreement between the two methods.

Materials and Methods: Ethical clearance was taken before the study. All the subjects were given proper instructions on how to collect complete semen sample. n = 60 diagnosed primary infertile male patients referred from the obstetrics and gynecology department. Semen of the same patient was analyzed by manual method and CASA software in accordance with the WHO guidelines. The results obtained were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation and Bland and Altman plot.

Results: On statistical analysis, “r” value obtained is 0.99 which is highly statistically significant. CASA and manual methods both agree with each other as proved by Bland and Altman plot.

Conclusion: Both methods can be used to screen semen samples in reproductive laboratories. Manual method is easy, feasible, requires expert analysis, and has subjective variability. CASA, on the other hand, is faster newer method with better reproducibility.

Key words: Manual Sperm Analysis; Computer-assisted Semen Analysis; Bland and Altman Plot





publications
0
supporting
0
mentioning
0
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.



Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 2
  • Captures
    • Readers: 20
see details

Bibliomed Article Statistics

27
16
31
33
35
39
38
50
53
58
60
1
R
E
A
D
S

32

20

35

28

25

35

14

29

30

28

33

D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
060708091011120102030405
20242025

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


We use cookies and other tracking technologies to work properly, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from. More Info Got It!