Background: Program evaluation is essential in establishing an effective mentoring program. Identifying the perception of mentees becomes an important qualitative component of the measurement of the effectiveness of a mentoring program.
Aims and Objective: The objective of the current study was to identify the perception of the 1st-year medical undergraduates toward the mentorship program.
Materials and Methods: Parallel mixed method design involved an initial quantitative survey followed by a qualitative study by focused group discussion (FGD) during 3 months in the 1st-year medical students in Government Medical College, Kannur, Kerala. A total of 96 students (n = 96) were present for the survey following which focus groups were formed from the same participants with 79 students in each group. Three such groups completed FGD by when data saturation was reached. Data were analyzed by quantitative and qualitative technique of focused group analysis.
Results: Survey results showed that though the program had poor satisfaction in time (12.5%) and stress management (19.8%) the students still liked (69.8%) and felt the need (72.9%) of the program. Focused groups also reflected similarity with the survey result and identified facilitating factors for the success of programs such as mentors concern, genuine interest, mentors positive attitude, encouragement and guidance, and some hindering factors such as less frequent mentoring sessions, lack of follow-up, communication, and personal interaction.
Conclusion: The perception of students helped to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a mentorship program with the focused group responses forming the basis for recommendation strategies to modify and improvise program primarily by improving communication and mentoring relationship.
Key words: Qualitative Research; Focus Groups; Medical Students; Communication; Surveys and Questionnaires
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
We use cookies and other tracking technologies to work properly, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from. More InfoGot It!